<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE seeks support for GE-minded politicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenhellblog.com/2009/08/19/gepac-advises-ge-employees-to-support-waxman-markey-because-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/08/19/gepac-advises-ge-employees-to-support-waxman-markey-because-of/</link>
	<description>How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:22:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: O&#8217;Malley&#8217;s hypocrisy on General Electric &#124; &#124; The Harrell Group, LLCThe Harrell Group, LLC</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/08/19/gepac-advises-ge-employees-to-support-waxman-markey-because-of/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[O&#8217;Malley&#8217;s hypocrisy on General Electric &#124; &#124; The Harrell Group, LLCThe Harrell Group, LLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=2640#comment-3579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt—Obama’s Job Czar and member of his Economic Recovery Board— stated he wasn’t “tackling climate concerns because it&#8217;s moral or trendy or good for PR…the biggest driver for me is business potential…” Immelt and GE will find much business potential in the menu of climate taxes, regulations and mandates proposed by O’Malley’s climate change commission.  Like Enron before it global warming legislation “would benefit many GE businesses.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt—Obama’s Job Czar and member of his Economic Recovery Board— stated he wasn’t “tackling climate concerns because it&#8217;s moral or trendy or good for PR…the biggest driver for me is business potential…” Immelt and GE will find much business potential in the menu of climate taxes, regulations and mandates proposed by O’Malley’s climate change commission.  Like Enron before it global warming legislation “would benefit many GE businesses.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TokyoTom</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/08/19/gepac-advises-ge-employees-to-support-waxman-markey-because-of/#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TokyoTom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=2640#comment-2503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven, I sympathize with your point, but you are actually barking up the wrong tree on GEPAC, which is not funded by GE at all, but is run and funded by voluntary contributions from individual GE managers - who have every right to band together to express their views.

But where are GE shareholders, who are technically the legal owners of the company? Where is THEIR PAC?

They, and shareholders in other listed companies, are generally nowhere to be seen, because the limited liability grant to shareholders encourages them to keep a distance, and to let management get involved in activities that may be profitable but shift risks to nonconsenting third parties. The result has been an escalating cycle of risk-shifting, reaction by citizens, regulation, and further rent-seeking by management - an enshrinement by the Supreme Court of #CorpSpeak

But is this dynamic anything that really concerns you, or do you only care to protest the rent-seeking that you dislike?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, I sympathize with your point, but you are actually barking up the wrong tree on GEPAC, which is not funded by GE at all, but is run and funded by voluntary contributions from individual GE managers &#8211; who have every right to band together to express their views.</p>
<p>But where are GE shareholders, who are technically the legal owners of the company? Where is THEIR PAC?</p>
<p>They, and shareholders in other listed companies, are generally nowhere to be seen, because the limited liability grant to shareholders encourages them to keep a distance, and to let management get involved in activities that may be profitable but shift risks to nonconsenting third parties. The result has been an escalating cycle of risk-shifting, reaction by citizens, regulation, and further rent-seeking by management &#8211; an enshrinement by the Supreme Court of #CorpSpeak</p>
<p>But is this dynamic anything that really concerns you, or do you only care to protest the rent-seeking that you dislike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dublds</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/08/19/gepac-advises-ge-employees-to-support-waxman-markey-because-of/#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dublds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=2640#comment-1914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In nearly any business or industry, when political lobbying is used as a shortcut to fair competition, innovation and sensible business practices, it is a sure sign of failure.  The government has increasingly been asked to intervene with labor disputes at the airlines and auto industries, and as we know both of these industries and their corresponding unions are hanging by a thread.  The film, and moreso record industries have lobbied heavily for stricter anti-piracy laws. Nonetheless, anyone who has ever made a mix tape knows that piracy is nothing new or suddenly rampant.  Fact is these industries have failed to remain relevant, and the internet has offered new and better alternatives.

As for GE, I&#039;ve said before and I&#039;ll say again, GE is an embarassment.  This news all but proves their new &quot;save the world&quot; mission statement is a front for &quot;save our company&quot;.  And their shamelessness about their inability rescue their company through any means of their own should be a HUGE warning sign for investors.  For a company with a history and name like GE has built, their current position should be a disgrace to them.  But instead they are talking up their new government-welfare business plan with all the adjectives usually reserved for celebrations and grand openings.  It&#039;s absolutely pitiful, and I like many investors have run like hell from any long positions in GE.  If nothing else, I would feel too guilty making money off a stock whose price was supported by poorly directed taxpayer funds.  

The only shame is that GE was once the poster boy for American manufacturing and quality.  Now that they are taking a proud place in the welfare line, what does this say about America itself.  GE is one of those rich corporations who we were going to tax to pay for our social programs.  Now that they look to become recipients themselves, what is the plan?

Obama?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In nearly any business or industry, when political lobbying is used as a shortcut to fair competition, innovation and sensible business practices, it is a sure sign of failure.  The government has increasingly been asked to intervene with labor disputes at the airlines and auto industries, and as we know both of these industries and their corresponding unions are hanging by a thread.  The film, and moreso record industries have lobbied heavily for stricter anti-piracy laws. Nonetheless, anyone who has ever made a mix tape knows that piracy is nothing new or suddenly rampant.  Fact is these industries have failed to remain relevant, and the internet has offered new and better alternatives.</p>
<p>As for GE, I&#8217;ve said before and I&#8217;ll say again, GE is an embarassment.  This news all but proves their new &#8220;save the world&#8221; mission statement is a front for &#8220;save our company&#8221;.  And their shamelessness about their inability rescue their company through any means of their own should be a HUGE warning sign for investors.  For a company with a history and name like GE has built, their current position should be a disgrace to them.  But instead they are talking up their new government-welfare business plan with all the adjectives usually reserved for celebrations and grand openings.  It&#8217;s absolutely pitiful, and I like many investors have run like hell from any long positions in GE.  If nothing else, I would feel too guilty making money off a stock whose price was supported by poorly directed taxpayer funds.  </p>
<p>The only shame is that GE was once the poster boy for American manufacturing and quality.  Now that they are taking a proud place in the welfare line, what does this say about America itself.  GE is one of those rich corporations who we were going to tax to pay for our social programs.  Now that they look to become recipients themselves, what is the plan?</p>
<p>Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmerr2009</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/08/19/gepac-advises-ge-employees-to-support-waxman-markey-because-of/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmerr2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=2640#comment-1913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the new &quot;1984&quot; GE will be the brother to oversee alll of supported by their friends in all Democratic Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the new &#8220;1984&#8243; GE will be the brother to oversee alll of supported by their friends in all Democratic Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

