In a ClimateWire article today touting the alarmist goal of 350 parts per million for atmospheric CO2, Stanford University climate hysteric Stephen Schneider made the following comment about “haggling over emissions targets”:
“We’re betting the planet. There’s no such thing as a safe level. There’s a level of very risky, versus mildly risky.
There’s no safe level of CO2? What is he talking about? If there’s no CO2, then there are no people or plants.
Maybe he’s just referring to the inverse correlation between atmospheric CO2 and sanity among alarmists.