<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CO2 Rock Star?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenhellblog.com/2009/11/11/co2-rock-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/11/11/co2-rock-star/</link>
	<description>How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:22:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: justbeau</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/11/11/co2-rock-star/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justbeau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=3018#comment-2280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually hoopla over anything, good or goofy, begets a lot of new ideas, the vast majority of which fail.  

Buffett is making a big investment in something tangible and old tech -- a railroad with which to carry coal.  Its a good idea.  Lots of land with railroads.  We will be using the coal. Rail is a near monopoly, so it charge a lot. Warren is keeping his wits, even if nitwits are excited about C02.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually hoopla over anything, good or goofy, begets a lot of new ideas, the vast majority of which fail.  </p>
<p>Buffett is making a big investment in something tangible and old tech &#8212; a railroad with which to carry coal.  Its a good idea.  Lots of land with railroads.  We will be using the coal. Rail is a near monopoly, so it charge a lot. Warren is keeping his wits, even if nitwits are excited about C02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaziklibey</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/11/11/co2-rock-star/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kaziklibey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=3018#comment-2279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who favor life CO2 should be a star, it&#039;s importance is as understated as it&#039;s villany is overstated by those who favor death and absence of life to such a degree they label it a pollutant. 

These two goliaths Buffet and Gates should construct two air tight biosperes, one for Buffet with elevated CO2 levels, one for Gates with little or no CO2, both pre-equipped with lovely gardens and animals to provide the men with nourishment. Busy men these two, we&#039;d even let proxies fill in for them. Period of time inside, 1 year. I&#039;ll volunteer to take Buffet&#039;s place, which great believer will fill in for Gates?

It would be extremely unlikely even a single one of the Malthusian morons would be willing to put themselves on the line over their supposed beliefs. But they are always eager to be a vocal member of the cult, that has it&#039;s rewards, primarily serving as a form of mental masterbation, a &quot;feel good&quot; thing.

They may not much like the thought of themselves slowly dying in a fruitless demonstration of their &quot;truths.&quot; But they sure don&#039;t mind causing countless others to slowly die as long as they profit a little &quot;feel good&quot; from it. 

Of course, like any decent self respecting death cult the puppeteers in charge operate immune from the congregation&#039;s criticism while living lives of unbelievable hypocrisy.

Sorry about the tangent, I did read the article. and Why waste tax dollars to fund senseless &quot;study&quot; of peridotite over a problem that has nothing to do with CO2, and everything to do with taxpayer funds encouraging fraudulent &quot;research&quot; by being there in the first place.

All that aside, CO2 still deserves superstar status.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who favor life CO2 should be a star, it&#8217;s importance is as understated as it&#8217;s villany is overstated by those who favor death and absence of life to such a degree they label it a pollutant. </p>
<p>These two goliaths Buffet and Gates should construct two air tight biosperes, one for Buffet with elevated CO2 levels, one for Gates with little or no CO2, both pre-equipped with lovely gardens and animals to provide the men with nourishment. Busy men these two, we&#8217;d even let proxies fill in for them. Period of time inside, 1 year. I&#8217;ll volunteer to take Buffet&#8217;s place, which great believer will fill in for Gates?</p>
<p>It would be extremely unlikely even a single one of the Malthusian morons would be willing to put themselves on the line over their supposed beliefs. But they are always eager to be a vocal member of the cult, that has it&#8217;s rewards, primarily serving as a form of mental masterbation, a &#8220;feel good&#8221; thing.</p>
<p>They may not much like the thought of themselves slowly dying in a fruitless demonstration of their &#8220;truths.&#8221; But they sure don&#8217;t mind causing countless others to slowly die as long as they profit a little &#8220;feel good&#8221; from it. </p>
<p>Of course, like any decent self respecting death cult the puppeteers in charge operate immune from the congregation&#8217;s criticism while living lives of unbelievable hypocrisy.</p>
<p>Sorry about the tangent, I did read the article. and Why waste tax dollars to fund senseless &#8220;study&#8221; of peridotite over a problem that has nothing to do with CO2, and everything to do with taxpayer funds encouraging fraudulent &#8220;research&#8221; by being there in the first place.</p>
<p>All that aside, CO2 still deserves superstar status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/11/11/co2-rock-star/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=3018#comment-2277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just last night I witnessed Bill Gates who (along with Warren Buffet) were center stage on CNBC on location at Columbia University.. Gates stated that &quot;bubbles&quot; of activity such as the current hoopla over the global environment tend to spawn many new ideas and ventures - the vast majority of which are utter failures..  Notwithstanding the incredibly hypocrisy of these two (especially Buffet), Gates comment was spot on and government subsidies for rocks that sequester a trace gas unproven to be detrimental (in fact essential) is a profound example...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last night I witnessed Bill Gates who (along with Warren Buffet) were center stage on CNBC on location at Columbia University.. Gates stated that &#8220;bubbles&#8221; of activity such as the current hoopla over the global environment tend to spawn many new ideas and ventures &#8211; the vast majority of which are utter failures..  Notwithstanding the incredibly hypocrisy of these two (especially Buffet), Gates comment was spot on and government subsidies for rocks that sequester a trace gas unproven to be detrimental (in fact essential) is a profound example&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justbeau</title>
		<link>http://greenhellblog.com/2009/11/11/co2-rock-star/#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justbeau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenhellblog.com/?p=3018#comment-2276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like a great idea for obtaining a government grant to enable eco-scientists to get paid to think about fixes for the problem that they say is so bad. 

Which is more plausible?  Eco-science or some of the instruments being peddled by Wall Street or Enron?   

Who to trust?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great idea for obtaining a government grant to enable eco-scientists to get paid to think about fixes for the problem that they say is so bad. </p>
<p>Which is more plausible?  Eco-science or some of the instruments being peddled by Wall Street or Enron?   </p>
<p>Who to trust?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

