Defend George Will and the right to question climate alarmism!

February 24, 2009

Please help defend nationally syndicated columnist George Will from the greens… you made be defending your own right to question green orthodoxy!

Here’s the story. On Feb. 15, the Washington Post published Will’s column “Dark Green Doomsayers.”

Not surprisingly, green groups (Center for American Progress Action Fund, Media Matters and Friends of the Earth) have gone ballistic). They’re mounting an e-mail campaign to the Post‘s ombudsman alleging that,

  • Will claimed that “according the U.N. World Meteorological Organization, there has been no recorded global warming for more than a decade.” This is false. In fact, the WMO recently stated that “global warming, mostly driven by greenhouse gas emissions, is continuing.”
  • Will misleadingly conflated Arctic and global sea ice levels to leave readers with the false impression that global warming isn’t real. After Will’s column was published, the University of Illinois’ Arctic Climate Research Center took issue with his use of their sea ice data, writing: “It is disturbing that the Washington Post would publish such information without first checking the facts.”
  • Will repeats science deniers’ discredited assertion that a scientific consensus about a global “cooling” crisis existed in the 1970s.

Comically, the greens allege that,

Unfortunately, the Washington Post has a pattern of printing demonstrably false assertions from science deniers. Post editors’ refusal to stand up for the truth strengthens the hand of polluting industries while irreparable harm is caused to our planet and its people.

The greens are demanding that,

the Washington Post correct demonstrably false statements in George Will’s column.

But Will’s statements are not false.

  • Will is correct about there being no warming since 1998 — e.g., check out this graph.
  • Will is correct about sea ice — it is higher today than 30 years ago.
  • As to a “consensus” 30 years ago on a looming ice-age, Will merely cited a number of major media that reported on the disaster-that-never-happened. Nevertheless, the National Academy of Sciences issued a report warning of a coming ice age in 1975, stating “A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale… because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.” [Source: Newsweek – April 28, 1975 “The Cooling World“]. NASA warned of human caused coming ‘ice age’ in 1971. The Washington Post reported on July 9, 1971 that, “The world could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age, a leading atmospheric scientist predicts.” NASA scientist S.I. Rasool, a colleague of James Hansen, made the predictions. The 1971 article continues: “In the next 50 years” — or by 2021 — fossil-fuel dust injected by man into the atmosphere “could screen out so much sunlight that the average temperature could drop by six degrees,” resulting in a buildup of “new glaciers that could eventually cover huge areas.” If sustained over “several years, five to 10,” or so Mr. Rasool est imated, “such a temperature decrease could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.” [Thanks to Marc Morano for the excerpts.]

Moreover, the Washington Post can hardly be considered as giving significant voice to climate skepticism. Other than the odd syndicated columns from Will, Charles Krauthammer, Robert Samuelson and perhaps a few others, the Post is a bastion of strident global warming alarmism.

What you need to do:

E-mail Washington Post ombudsman Andy Alexander at ombudsman@washpost.com and defend George Will’s right to dissent from global warming orthodoxy!

6 Responses to “Defend George Will and the right to question climate alarmism!”

  1. Ed Darrell Says:

    Why not simply correct his errors? There is no honor in defending bad data. In other areas of enterprise, we call that “lying.” One would hope a journalist like George Will would try to avoid that.

  2. Just Beau Says:

    Too many scientists, journalists and political leaders have conveniently ignored Global Warming, perhaps out of deference to freedom of private belief or a generous assumption that GW scientists would not get something so wrong. However, when a cult’s faith becomes grounds for monumental assault on the economy, it is welcome for sensible people to wade into the topic, as has Mr. Will.

  3. goodspkr Says:

    Gosh, GW quoted a source that later revised its estimates, but still was generally correct.

    Where was the hype when the story came out that Anarctica was warming and it was found to be totally false. Seems that they took readings from two stations, clipped them together and low and behold they found warming.

  4. reasonmclucus Says:

    Those who recognize that global warming is a fraud need to do a better job of informing people that the so called greenhouse effect is impossible. Even greenhouses don’t warm up from “trapping” infrared radiation as physicist R. W. Wood demonstrated in a 1909 experiment.

    http://globalwarmingnot.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/03/greenhouse_theory_disproved_a_century_ago.thtml

  5. Malcolm Says:

    George Will’s article entitled “Dark Green Doomsayers” is outstanding. Bravo. A writer about climate change who takes the effort and time to get some facts before speaking.

    Thank you. Thank you. You restore my faith in journalists and the media. You bring a glimmer of hope.

    Malcolm Roberts

    Brisbane, Australia

  6. globalhoax Says:

    We really need to keep the pressure on the media, DAILY and challenge every single one of these environmental groups that make up the propaganda machine, how about we start suing them for stealing our future?

    Man oh man imagine if we could get an army of attorneys and funding to simply slap automatic lawsuits on them every time they restrict our energy, or promote the global warming lie, after all they’re stealing our future, they are creating regulations and controls that make things cost more and steal our rights, why not?

    I think even the media needs a few too, for promoting an agenda that has is hell bent on shutting down our natural energy resources, oil, gas, coal, nuclear.

    I wrote the guy at the Post, not only to defend George Will’s right to dissent, but that they should be digging into the truth and challenging every claim…you know like do their job.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: