Lawsuit won’t succeed against EPA on CO2

April 15, 2009

In advance of Thursday’s expected announcement from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that carbon dioxide from automobiles is a threat to public health and welfare and, therefore, is subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act — the so-called “endangerment” finding — rumors are flyign around town that businesses may sue the agency.

This is a loser strategy that will accomplish nothing other than to make Beltway lawyers richer.

The Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. EPA that EPA can regulate CO2 if it finds that it is a hazard to public health and welfare.

As long as the EPA is not “arbitrary and capricious” in deciding that CO2 is such a threat, the agency will win in federal court.

The “arbitrary and capricious” standard of the Administrative Procedures Act is a notoriously lax (i.e., pro-agency) standard. It’s really a non-standard that essentially allows federal agencies to get away with regulatory murder. As long as the EPA can point to some (any) rationale for CO2 being a threat — however ludicrous in the real world, even the UN reports — the agency will win.

An appeal to the current (and likely future) Supremes won’t succeed as the tie-breaking vote between the four conservative justices (Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, and Alito) and the four liberal justices (Stevens, Ginsburg, Souter and Breyer) is Anthony Kennedy — a pseudo-conservative who, enjoying swing-vote status, voted for Massachusetts (and against the Bush administration) in the earlier case.

Industry should instead fight back on a political level — the 2010 elections. A bill to block the EPA from acting on its finding should be introduced immediately. It should be made clear to any politician opposing such a bill that his job is at stake. The bill effort should be backed-up by CO2 TEA parties.

4 Responses to “Lawsuit won’t succeed against EPA on CO2”

  1. […] Lawsuit won’t succeed against EPA on CO2 […]

  2. jblethen Says:

    Kennedy might change his vote next time.

  3. sbartsch Says:

    The response should NOT be to sue the EPA to stop the regulation – that is a loser’s strategy.

    What should be done is to launch immediate lawsuits against the EPA to announce sweeping regulations for ALL CO2 Producers! Force their hand on this – and the entire scheme comes tumbling down!

    Could it be painful if we win such a lawsuit? Yes – and that’s the point. Instead of creating “doomsday” scenarios where we claim that the sky is falling, bring the whole darn thing down! Because this is all reversible if we cause enough pain quickly enough!

  4. naturalclimate Says:

    Well, if CO2 is fair game, then so is dihydrogen monoxide. Now THAT is a substance worth regulating:

Leave a Reply to jblethen Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: