Al Gore’s geothermal driller misled feds on earthquake risks

June 24, 2009

The New York Times reported today that AltaRock Energy — a start-up geothermal energy firm whose investors include Al Gore’s venture capital firm, Kleiner Perkins — failed to notify federal regulators that the bedrock drilling technique it is using in the San Francisco-area had been linked with a project-ending 3.4-magnitude earthquake in Basel, Switzerland in 2006.

According to the Times:

AltaRock, in its seismic activity report, included the Basel earthquake in a list of temblors near geothermal projects, but the company denied that it had left out crucial details of the quake in seeking approval for the project in California. So far, the company has received its permit from the federal Bureau of Land Management to drill its first hole on land leased to the Northern California Power Agency, but still awaits a second permit to fracture rock.

“We did discuss Basel, in particular, the 3.4 event, with the B.L.M. early in the project,” Mr. Turner said in an e-mail response to questions after the visit.

But Richard Estabrook, a petroleum engineer in the Ukiah, Calif., field office of the land agency who has a lead role in granting the necessary federal permits, gave a different account when asked if he knew that the Basel project had shut down because of earthquakes or that it had induced more than 3,500 quakes.

“I’ll be honest,” he said. “I didn’t know that.”

Gore says “the planet has a fever.” I wonder if he’s worried about giving the already grouchy earth under San Francisco a splitting headache?

Waxman-Markey delenda est!

2 Responses to “Al Gore’s geothermal driller misled feds on earthquake risks”

  1. […] geothermal projects appear to increase the likelihood of earthquakes. Not only does clean coal require the burning of 30 percent more coal to provide the necessary […]

  2. dannewton Says:

    I don’t see any problem with the occassional earthquake, especially if it is down to about 3.0 but it seems like there is a new liberalism with what might be a worst case scenario if LIBERALS are in favor of it. It might even be that the occassional man-made liberation of seismic energy could facilitate a more gentle future earthquake.
    Besides, now we could just borrow some more money and glue it all back together. Saving the planet ain’t cheap.

    If animals die from oil slicks, that is bad, bad, bad but if they fly into the spinning blades of a windmill… no problem. For those who want to spare, at any cost, their self-esteem, all they can do is to disengage their minds and wait to be told what the politically correct thing is to do and think. As soon as solar becomes a means for the rich to make money, they will finally figure out that it is changing the microclimate and has to be stopped.

Leave a Reply to dannewton Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: